OFAC-sanctioned Litecoin addresses

OFAC publishes digital-currency addresses as fields on SDN entries. As of 2026-08-28, the SDN list carries 14 Litecoin (LTC) listings belonging to 10 designated persons. Every listing is below.

14
LTC listings
10
designated persons
2019-08-21
first entity designation
2026-07-13
latest entity designation
Sending to any address below is a prohibited transaction for a U.S. person, and a sanctions exposure for everyone else. Strict liability applies: intent is not an element of the violation, and neither is knowing the address was listed. This page is a reference, not a screening control — an address list you copied last month is out of date the next time OFAC publishes.

Why an address list is not a screening control

OFAC adds and removes addresses without notice, and a designated person can move funds to a fresh address at any time. There are three specific ways a static copy of this table fails in production:

Who these Litecoin addresses belong to

Designated personLTC listingsOFAC programs
Secondeye Solution3CYBER2, ELECTION-EO13848
Andreyev Anton Nikolaeyvich2CYBER2, ELECTION-EO13848
Rashevskyi Dmytro2CYBER4
Cryptex1CYBER2, RUSSIA-EO14024
First VPN Service1CYBER4
KARASAVIDI Dmitrii1CYBER2
Lifshits Artem Mikhaylovich1CYBER2, ELECTION-EO13848
RAZA Mujtaba Ali1CYBER2, ELECTION-EO13848
Wang Yunhe1CYBER2
Zheng Guanghua1SDNTK

All 14 Litecoin address listings on the SDN list

Reproduced exactly as OFAC publishes them. The date is the entity's original designation date, not the address-add date, which OFAC does not publish.

LTC addressDesignated personEntity designated
ltc1qr8ntsedq8tv0svmxqhzvdcdl5k7kntdmnhwep7First VPN Service2026-07-13
LcP1DumXkNJbBtSYD3XxAfsJ2nZR5hLdpMRashevskyi Dmytro2026-07-13
LbPAqHvemZBv3pvAqiAtDnZ3U1t6EziaL1Rashevskyi Dmytro2026-07-13
M8yFL6SFC6TreATegTyuSYkDfDRbisdpT3Cryptex2024-09-26
LNf2JDiuunBz7GMDKFYHN4rq5meXWxiwfbWang Yunhe2024-05-28
LgwmgYnraU2uBWHVFUDgAmFCPYj5Yw8C9LSecondeye Solution2021-04-15
LeKvNdNEzgQkzVVnRdV3fAu2DSF1nLsNw6Secondeye Solution2021-04-15
LeKvNdNEzgQkzVVnRdV3fAu2DSF1nLsNw6RAZA Mujtaba Ali2021-04-15
LQAhYwwK5AR1JQiQPr7vu8Pu4b6qcxxvNBSecondeye Solution2021-04-15
LNwgtMxcKUQ51dw7bQL1yPQjBVZh6QEqsdKARASAVIDI Dmitrii2020-09-16
Leo3j36nn1JcsUQruytQhFUdCdCH5YHMR3Lifshits Artem Mikhaylovich2020-09-10
LaYUy1DGfVSuSF5KbPhbLrm8kRotqiwUJnAndreyev Anton Nikolaeyvich2020-09-10
LWnbjLYUfqeokfbWM4FcU7uk2FP2DSxuWSAndreyev Anton Nikolaeyvich2020-09-10
LaizKtS5DUhPuP1nTQcc83MS7HwK6vk85zZheng Guanghua2019-08-21

Programs these addresses were designated under

ProgramListings
CYBER210
ELECTION-EO138487
CYBER43
RUSSIA-EO140241
SDNTK1

Screen this programmatically

The same data behind this page is available as a single unauthenticated GET. It checks an address against every digital-currency address on the SDN list, and returns a match list rather than a yes/no so you can log what matched and why:

curl "https://sanctionsai.dev/sanctions?wallet=ltc1qr8ntsedq8tv0svmxqhzvdcdl5k7kntdmnhwep7"

The free tier allows 5 checks per day with no signup, which is enough to wire the call up and see the response shape. Production limits and the audit log are on the paid tiers; the API reference covers batch screening and the degraded flag you should alert on.

Screen addresses at transaction time, not from a page

SanctionsAI is an OFAC screening API for automated systems: one GET per address or counterparty name, matched against the full SDN list rather than a chain-scoped copy, with an audit trail of what matched. Free tier, no signup.

See pricing

Source. Every figure on this page is counted from the U.S. Treasury OFAC SDN enhanced XML export, published 2026-08-28. No figure is estimated. The machine-readable sources manifest records the counting method. The authoritative list is OFAC's own Sanctions List Search.

Scope. SDN list only. This page does not cover the OFAC Consolidated (non-SDN) lists, the Sectoral Sanctions Identifications list, or the EU, UK or UN lists, and it does not apply the 50 Percent Rule, under which entities owned 50% or more by blocked persons are themselves blocked without being listed by name.

Not legal or compliance advice. A screening decision requires the official list and, where the stakes warrant it, counsel.